Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PaulR" data-source="post: 614133" data-attributes="member: 176256">Well, just about anything is possible ifyou're prepared to throw enough money at&nbsp; the problem but realistically, the answer is no.Why do you want to use the satellite receiver to view the terrestrial channel?&nbsp; Is it because it has a recording function?&nbsp; Or is to view it about the house?I can't really think of any reason that can't be got around some other way.With regards to $ly's policy, in the end it all comes down to money.&nbsp; While you might think that there isn't enough money from the subscription fees you're obviously wrong as I don't notice $ly passing round the begging bowl!In fact the current financial situation has actually made $ly's position stronger as channels find their advertising revenue going down and having to rely more and more on a slice of the subscription.&nbsp; Things are so bad, in fact, that reportedly some channels which have been FTA are thinking of joining the $ly brigade!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PaulR, post: 614133, member: 176256"] Well, just about anything is possible ifyou're prepared to throw enough money at the problem but realistically, the answer is no. Why do you want to use the satellite receiver to view the terrestrial channel? Is it because it has a recording function? Or is to view it about the house? I can't really think of any reason that can't be got around some other way. With regards to $ly's policy, in the end it all comes down to money. While you might think that there isn't enough money from the subscription fees you're obviously wrong as I don't notice $ly passing round the begging bowl! In fact the current financial situation has actually made $ly's position stronger as channels find their advertising revenue going down and having to rely more and more on a slice of the subscription. Things are so bad, in fact, that reportedly some channels which have been FTA are thinking of joining the $ly brigade! [/QUOTE]

Verification