Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
SDR radio, Software Defined Radio
RTL1090 thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="s-band" data-source="post: 976413" data-attributes="member: 407744"><p>Unless I've lost the plot (quite possible), I understood that the Airspy only has the R820T2 as a front end without an extra LNA. The LNA control in the software operates on the R820</p><p></p><p>The main advantage of the Airspy is that it has a better ADC (12 vs 7.5 bits) giving a better instantaneous dynamic range and resolution.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Assuming:</p><p>LNA NF = 1dB, Gain 15dB</p><p>Cable Loss NF = 10dB Gain =-10dB</p><p>RX (Airspy or RTL) NF = 5dB</p><p>Using HP/Agilent Appcad <a href="http://www.hp.woodshot.com" target="_blank">AppCAD</a></p><p>LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > 3dB atten for stability > LNA3 > Cable > RX gives NF of <strong>1.22dB</strong> (NF without atten 1.21dB )</p><p>LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > Cable > RX gives <strong>1.41dB</strong> NF</p><p>LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > Cable > LNA 3 > RX gives <strong>1.28dB</strong> NF</p><p></p><p>For satellite you really need to play with the whole budget including the antenna. Try plugging some of the figures into this calculator: <a href="http://www.satsig.net/noise.htm" target="_blank">Noise temperature, Noise Figure and Noise Factor</a></p><p></p><p>All theory though! I haven't tried an RTL dongle with L band JAERO although the performance on C band (where the NF is determined 99.9% by LNB ) was the same using an Airspy or RTL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="s-band, post: 976413, member: 407744"] Unless I've lost the plot (quite possible), I understood that the Airspy only has the R820T2 as a front end without an extra LNA. The LNA control in the software operates on the R820 The main advantage of the Airspy is that it has a better ADC (12 vs 7.5 bits) giving a better instantaneous dynamic range and resolution. Assuming: LNA NF = 1dB, Gain 15dB Cable Loss NF = 10dB Gain =-10dB RX (Airspy or RTL) NF = 5dB Using HP/Agilent Appcad [URL='http://www.hp.woodshot.com']AppCAD[/URL] LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > 3dB atten for stability > LNA3 > Cable > RX gives NF of [B]1.22dB[/B] (NF without atten 1.21dB ) LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > Cable > RX gives [B]1.41dB[/B] NF LNA1 > Filter > LNA2 > Cable > LNA 3 > RX gives [B]1.28dB[/B] NF For satellite you really need to play with the whole budget including the antenna. Try plugging some of the figures into this calculator: [URL='http://www.satsig.net/noise.htm']Noise temperature, Noise Figure and Noise Factor[/URL] All theory though! I haven't tried an RTL dongle with L band JAERO although the performance on C band (where the NF is determined 99.9% by LNB ) was the same using an Airspy or RTL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
SDR radio, Software Defined Radio
RTL1090 thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top