Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1127450" data-attributes="member: 332642">I would call that 4 LNBs in one housing.Or a &quot;quad-feed LNB&quot;, never leaving the &quot;quad-feed&quot; out of the expression.Because functionally you've used up all the diseqc x.0 functionality with this quad-feed LNB; with the other LNB added you already need diseqc x.1. Or maybe not just the original Unicable protocol, but the JESS protocol.From what I've read superficially about Technirouter, DurLine and SUS21 they may work on just two LNBs, or maybe on 4 LNBs with diseqc x.0.I'll leave the investigating of that to you, or to others.When you stick to wanting 2 (added: independant) receivers and 5 satellite positions and just 1 cable, I think you need a Unicable/JESS multiswitch near your dish(es), and I think the quad-feed LNB might be unsuitable for that. So quite an expensive solution.Greetz,A33</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1127450, member: 332642"] I would call that 4 LNBs in one housing. Or a "quad-feed LNB", never leaving the "quad-feed" out of the expression. Because functionally you've used up all the diseqc x.0 functionality with this quad-feed LNB; with the other LNB added you already need diseqc x.1. Or maybe not just the original Unicable protocol, but the JESS protocol. From what I've read superficially about Technirouter, DurLine and SUS21 they may work on just two LNBs, or maybe on 4 LNBs with diseqc x.0. I'll leave the investigating of that to you, or to others. When you stick to wanting 2 [I](added: independant) [/I]receivers and 5 satellite positions and just 1 cable, I think you need a Unicable/JESS multiswitch near your dish(es), and I think the quad-feed LNB might be unsuitable for that. So quite an expensive solution. Greetz, A33 [/QUOTE]

Verification