Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John" data-source="post: 983576" data-attributes="member: 175005">.... I,ll start you off then.To help others to understand what you have got and hopefully that will chime in .....Required: ..... Pictures, good resolution pictures, of the dish, dish mount including any motor equipment etc, make of dish.Is it all original or is it a mix and match ? .... do you know the focal point distance,&nbsp; PF or OS (might be a CM).Not familiar with that receiver so can't comment on that.The performance difference stated between the 1.8 Raven suggests a problem ... ie: is it petalised, has it been strung ?.I would have a shot at 55 West to try and get you in the right ball park with the dish set-up , there's some pretty strong transponders on there which a good aligned and constructed 2.4 antenna should be ok with &amp; remove the slab on the TiT of course.Awaiting the pictures <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="John, post: 983576, member: 175005"] .... I,ll start you off then. To help others to understand what you have got and hopefully that will chime in ..... Required: ..... Pictures, good resolution pictures, of the dish, dish mount including any motor equipment etc, make of dish. Is it all original or is it a mix and match ? .... do you know the focal point distance, PF or OS (might be a CM). Not familiar with that receiver so can't comment on that. The performance difference stated between the 1.8 Raven suggests a problem ... ie: is it petalised, has it been strung ?. I would have a shot at 55 West to try and get you in the right ball park with the dish set-up , there's some pretty strong transponders on there which a good aligned and constructed 2.4 antenna should be ok with & remove the slab on the TiT of course. Awaiting the pictures :) [/QUOTE]

Verification