Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1146335" data-attributes="member: 332642">By the way.That is the reason for a new (in german forums) advocated procedure between cable 4 and cable 5 in your picture: don't put the braid 'down' over the 'black' outside of the cable (as is shown in cable 5 of the picture); but rotate it over the di-electricum, just above the black outside of the cable (clock-wise, in the screw-on direction). The black cable-outside will push the braid against the F-plug-inside.No more cut-offs then.[USER=414470]@Red alert[/USER] :Did you check a possible power issue: not enough current from the receiver, or too much resistance in the cable?Did you try the Octagon SX89 with a very short piece of cable?And have you tried if the motor moves, when no LNB is connected, (edit: also with the SX89? I only now read that you've tested that with one receiver, already, but maybe not with both.) ?Greetz,A33</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1146335, member: 332642"] By the way. That is the reason for a new (in german forums) advocated procedure between cable 4 and cable 5 in your picture: don't put the braid 'down' over the 'black' outside of the cable (as is shown in cable 5 of the picture); but rotate it over the di-electricum, just above the black outside of the cable (clock-wise, in the screw-on direction). The black cable-outside will push the braid against the F-plug-inside. No more cut-offs then. [USER=414470]@Red alert[/USER] : Did you check a possible power issue: not enough current from the receiver, or too much resistance in the cable? Did you try the Octagon SX89 with a very short piece of cable? And have you tried if the motor moves, when no LNB is connected, [I](edit: also with the SX89? I only now read that you've tested that with one receiver, already, but maybe not with both.) [/I]? Greetz, A33 [/QUOTE]

Verification