Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sir Bronking" data-source="post: 234839" data-attributes="member: 197546">just found ....<img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /> my 2 peneth1. many years ago people came up with simple theories to explain all sorts of things eg eclipses....goes dark.....the gods aint happy, the sun revolves around the earth, or the earth is the centre of the universe....whatever?2. in todays modern science we now over analise things whereby by results come from complicated theories.3. so therefor these complicated theories give rise to selective ingrediants4. the anthropic priciple = cooking the booksto think that we must be the end of the chain&nbsp; of events and are therfor the most evoluted(is that a word?) presence in this universe is wishfull thinking on a grand scale, at the end of the day darwin's take on evolution is correct but whose to say other lifeforms haven't&nbsp; had millions of years head start? hopefully my take makes sense <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /> agreed or notor as CH would say....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sir Bronking, post: 234839, member: 197546"] just found ....:) my 2 peneth 1. many years ago people came up with simple theories to explain all sorts of things eg eclipses....goes dark.....the gods aint happy, the sun revolves around the earth, or the earth is the centre of the universe....whatever? 2. in todays modern science we now over analise things whereby by results come from complicated theories. 3. so therefor these complicated theories give rise to selective ingrediants 4. the anthropic priciple = cooking the books to think that we must be the end of the chain of events and are therfor the most evoluted(is that a word?) presence in this universe is wishfull thinking on a grand scale, at the end of the day darwin's take on evolution is correct but whose to say other lifeforms haven't had millions of years head start? hopefully my take makes sense :) agreed or not or as CH would say.... [/QUOTE]

Verification