Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
Einstein's Alcove
The Moon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Butterbox" data-source="post: 78809" data-attributes="member: 177606"><p>Once you had decided to fake the landing, very few people would need to be involved. In the new footage there is visable audio of Armstrong being cued when to communicate back to ground control in order to fake the delay. It also shows footage of the astranauts setting up the shot of the earth from orbit to make it look like it was further away. There is so much evidence from space-suits, lack of stars, booster noise, crosshairs behind images, backgrounds repeating, voice analysis, shadow analysis, that NASA should easily be able to explain. Considering where their funding comes from I would think they would not want 30% of the public disbelieving their achievements and would address each issue.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the moon rock, it has been suggested that his came from a meteor hit 5 months prior to the launch in Texas. It would explain why scientists were dismayed when the samples brought back showed the moon to be older than the earth and not part of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Butterbox, post: 78809, member: 177606"] Once you had decided to fake the landing, very few people would need to be involved. In the new footage there is visable audio of Armstrong being cued when to communicate back to ground control in order to fake the delay. It also shows footage of the astranauts setting up the shot of the earth from orbit to make it look like it was further away. There is so much evidence from space-suits, lack of stars, booster noise, crosshairs behind images, backgrounds repeating, voice analysis, shadow analysis, that NASA should easily be able to explain. Considering where their funding comes from I would think they would not want 30% of the public disbelieving their achievements and would address each issue. Regarding the moon rock, it has been suggested that his came from a meteor hit 5 months prior to the launch in Texas. It would explain why scientists were dismayed when the samples brought back showed the moon to be older than the earth and not part of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
Einstein's Alcove
The Moon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top