Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1082950" data-attributes="member: 332642">So east-west-wise the pole looks plumb. That's good.Test/check of #8 and #16 was:You can test this in the trust-way (#16), or by finding the exact middle left and exact middle right of the dish, and comparing length left to the back of the motor to length right to the back of the motor, while motor at zero-position. They should be the same.Using the modified angles, if you like, is just a matter of using the chart(s) linked in my linked post. But the fact of your asymmetric arc-following problem is more important ATM, I would say.Setting up a motor is best done by following strict procedure, step by step; as a 'fault' in an early step can hardly/not be counteracted in a later step.Alas I haven't seen a USALS-procedure that I liked 100%, all have their pros and cons. Did you use a specific one? Which one (link)?Greetz,A33</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1082950, member: 332642"] So east-west-wise the pole looks plumb. That's good. Test/check of #8 and #16 was: You can test this in the trust-way (#16), or by finding the exact middle left and exact middle right of the dish, and comparing length left to the back of the motor to length right to the back of the motor, [B]while motor [B]at [/B]zero-position[/B]. They should be the same. Using the modified angles, if you like, is just a matter of using the chart(s) linked in my linked post. But the fact of your asymmetric arc-following problem is more important ATM, I would say. Setting up a motor is best done by following strict procedure, step by step; as a 'fault' in an early step can hardly/not be counteracted in a later step. Alas I haven't seen a USALS-procedure that I liked 100%, all have their pros and cons. Did you use a specific one? Which one (link)? Greetz, A33 [/QUOTE]

Verification