Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1113862" data-attributes="member: 332642">In fact it would be a multifeed dish, that has a focal line (a line of focal points) instead of just one focal point. So which LNB is &quot;central&quot; is not important, in fact, with the G2 they are both equally offset from center (as written above).The G2 bracket for 13E and 19E is I believe designed for France or central europe? So it might be that the distance between the LNBs is a bit greater than needed, and you have to find the best compromise for aiming the azimuth for the dish.It could well be that you now have maximum reception for 13E and suboptimal reception for 19E, and that you'd have to find a new compromise for optimal reception of both satellites.Is reception of 19E better, when you carefully push the whole dish a bit to the left (seen from behind the dish)?Also, is the arm still firmly fixed to the dish?Greetz,A33</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1113862, member: 332642"] In fact it would be a multifeed dish, that has a focal line (a line of focal points) instead of just one focal point. So which LNB is "central" is not important, in fact, with the G2 they are both equally offset from center (as written above). The G2 bracket for 13E and 19E is I believe designed for France or central europe? So it might be that the distance between the LNBs is a bit greater than needed, and you have to find the best compromise for aiming the azimuth for the dish. It could well be that you now have [I]maximum[/I] reception for 13E and [I]suboptimal[/I] reception for 19E, and that you'd have to find a new compromise for optimal reception of both satellites. Is reception of 19E better, when you carefully push the whole dish a bit to the left (seen from behind the dish)? Also, is the arm still firmly fixed to the dish? Greetz, A33 [/QUOTE]

Verification