Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1162678" data-attributes="member: 297935">The discussion about C-band and 5G, for those who receive this band and have problems with interference, makes me think of the sad and paradoxical situation we are in for the reception. Specifically, we are caught between two technological eras in C-band. On the one hand, we use the same type of antennas from the last century, and on the other, transmission is done using the techniques of these last years. Who would have imagined 4G, or 5G, in the '80s or '90s that this technology would use the C-band? If digital transmission develops at this rate, the C-band may be expanded, as it is now, but not in current use.LNBs for 5G are just palliatives for the moment that don't solve the interference problem. For example, the Mediastar 5G working between 3.7 and 4.3GHz doesn't cancel them between 3700-3800 MHz. You can see this on the C-band spectrum obtained at 57.0ESuppose you can see interference on the spectrum even with antennas over 4 m. In that case, I wonder if, in the (immediate) future, the C-band may still be relevant for enthusiasts who cannot keep up with the latest developments in satellite reception and transmission. This hobby is becoming increasingly expensive for those with small pockets, like others in technology.This development should not surprise us since the dream of any reception enthusiast is to have the giant antennas he sees from the big satellite operators in his backyard.However, the situation is not reassuring in the Ku-band either, where we can observe the same phenomenon of terrestrial interference on some portions of the band, although it is not discussed on the forum, as if it did not exist.If this trend continues, we will discuss the same phenomenon in the Ku-band tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.<img src="http://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

Verification