satesco
Specialist Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,935
- Reaction score
- 2,705
- Points
- 113
- My Satellite Setup
-
seven antennas,one toroidal with 16 lnbs,
6 satellite receivers,2 Meters,9 PC cards(tbs6983,6903,6590,6504,6522,6209,2603,6909X,6903X,6902se,skystar hd2),2 tuners usb-tbs5927 & tbs5925,Skystar HD.
Satellite reception between 100.5E-50.0W
- My Location
- Romania
Thanks,@adonis, for the link to 95.0E, which I consulted before.
But this discussion would be worth having with Mr. Bozoth, who reported their existence on FlySat, especially as he confirms that they are the same transponders I found last summer. Of course, it is now only a question whether these muxes are at 95.0E on SES-12/8 or 96.5E on Express-103. And I thank him for that, as I was not wrong when I found them. The problem is different; I thought these transponders were on the 97.3/7E satellites.
I don't want to contradict him all the more with the authority he has in the DX world and mine; of course, plus he has a giant antenna than mine, lilliputian, with which he checks and rechecks what he finds, but I have to say it got me thinking that I too rechecked if the transponders posted at 95. 0 E is really at that position or 96.5E?
Even though my antenna is small, and because of that, the error rate in determining the position of the muxes found increases the poorer the equipment. So my chances of getting it wrong are higher, so there is no point in insisting. But after another check, I found the transponders at 96.5E and only at 96.5E.
And there is another element that got me thinking, namely, on FlySat, the reported transponders are placed on the South Asia spot. Or for me, it is pretty miraculous that I can catch with my antenna of only 1.50m muxes from that remote area. I think it is a mistake to place them in that area. Instead, the signal comes from Central Asia, I guess.
For now, I limit myself to posting once again muxes found between 12500-12540 V at 96.5E and the signal in the upper band at 95.0E, where I found no signal to lock.
Until another enthusiast who has access with his antenna to these positions confirms or denies my allegation, I will maintain my doubt that the transponders in question are at 95.0E.
O course, this message of mine may be read by Mr. Bozoth or other enthusiasts who can help me not to err in my above judgment.
And I close by apologizing for my long text, saying I want to be wrong and prove Mr. Bozoth right. It would force me to correct specific parameters of my antenna, which can only be checked under challenging situations. And we must admit that satellite reception at low elevations is a test for all of us.
Here is what I found at 96.5E and not at 95.0E with Crazyscan and IQmonitor:
But this discussion would be worth having with Mr. Bozoth, who reported their existence on FlySat, especially as he confirms that they are the same transponders I found last summer. Of course, it is now only a question whether these muxes are at 95.0E on SES-12/8 or 96.5E on Express-103. And I thank him for that, as I was not wrong when I found them. The problem is different; I thought these transponders were on the 97.3/7E satellites.
I don't want to contradict him all the more with the authority he has in the DX world and mine; of course, plus he has a giant antenna than mine, lilliputian, with which he checks and rechecks what he finds, but I have to say it got me thinking that I too rechecked if the transponders posted at 95. 0 E is really at that position or 96.5E?
Even though my antenna is small, and because of that, the error rate in determining the position of the muxes found increases the poorer the equipment. So my chances of getting it wrong are higher, so there is no point in insisting. But after another check, I found the transponders at 96.5E and only at 96.5E.
And there is another element that got me thinking, namely, on FlySat, the reported transponders are placed on the South Asia spot. Or for me, it is pretty miraculous that I can catch with my antenna of only 1.50m muxes from that remote area. I think it is a mistake to place them in that area. Instead, the signal comes from Central Asia, I guess.
For now, I limit myself to posting once again muxes found between 12500-12540 V at 96.5E and the signal in the upper band at 95.0E, where I found no signal to lock.
Until another enthusiast who has access with his antenna to these positions confirms or denies my allegation, I will maintain my doubt that the transponders in question are at 95.0E.
O course, this message of mine may be read by Mr. Bozoth or other enthusiasts who can help me not to err in my above judgment.
And I close by apologizing for my long text, saying I want to be wrong and prove Mr. Bozoth right. It would force me to correct specific parameters of my antenna, which can only be checked under challenging situations. And we must admit that satellite reception at low elevations is a test for all of us.
Here is what I found at 96.5E and not at 95.0E with Crazyscan and IQmonitor:
Attachments
-
96.5E_12500-12750 HV_2023-01-23_20-18-26.png76.1 KB · Views: 24
-
96°5E_12524_V_1.jpg191.2 KB · Views: 15
-
96°5E_12517_V_1.jpg192.3 KB · Views: 5
-
96°5E_12509_V_1.jpg191.3 KB · Views: 6
-
96°5E_12521_V_1.jpg192.5 KB · Views: 7
-
96°5E_2301232304.jpg84.7 KB · Views: 7
-
96°5E_2301232304_12503-12535 V .jpg115.1 KB · Views: 7
-
95.0E_12500-12750 HV_2023-01-23_19-49-17.png62.4 KB · Views: 12