Maybe someone more "educated" can point to something to definitely clarify that issue?
To which I obviously don't count?
As you probably have read in the eutelsat documents, diseqc has a "
bus protocol", and therefore can be used parallel and serial, which they described also. As I wrote:
Anything goes!
As long as the proper commands can reach them, through the chain.
So the "everywhere, immediately" is not important.
When a diseqc switch gets power, first the "default port" (1 or A) is chosen, and only after that a relevant switching command is executed.
The non-targetted LNBs don't need to get a command or a voltage, as they are not targetted.
Only some 22kHz (e.g. from Ecoda) switches (common in USA) pass diseqc commands and power permanently; diseqc switches do NOT.
Examples of 'nonconventional' diseqc setups:
receiver - diseqc1.1 UC1 - diseqc1.1 UC3/4 - diseqc1.0 - LNBs in
DISEqC, 20 lnb's schakelen
parallel use of diseqc 1.0 in
Parallel schakelen van diseqc switches
I believe
@Vipersan also used diseqc 1.0 and 1.1 parallel, or in the nonconventional order. Its in this forum, and was at that time an inspriration to me to investigate diseqc protocol further.
Cannot find an easy link though; he posted too much....
I've not seen the order receiver - committed switch - uncommitted switch - LNBs used often in forums, but the few times I've seen it, I've always liked the creativity and nonconventionality of it!
greetz,
A33
Edit: added a bit.