I agree, its a bit of a let down really, I was really excited in the weeks leading up to the landing and then what do we get a couple of crumby low res photos, but then thinking about digital cameras, they cant have been that good seven years ago, even now people still sell them for mobile phones with 320x240 resolution.DaDragon said:Seems a bit quiet lately,i've been waiting for some more colour pictures but nothing doing.Do you think the've found something a bit special?,and are keeping a lid on it.!!Looked on their web site(ESA) and it's just the same stuff.I'm not getting paroniod or anything,i know there's no little green men,(it's cold enough to freeze the b*ll*cks off a brass monkey)you would just expect a lot more action since it took 7 years to get there!!!!
Regards DaDragon
I'm not denying the fact that they managed to get a probe on to titan is a great success, but I am just disappointed at the imagery coming back, I expected a lot more.Channel Hopper said:I think they did rather well
Look its quite obvious that you are impressed by the efforts, I understand the complexities of completing such a mission and for what it was, it was a great success. But for the fact that they knew the misson was so big timewise, I personally (and it looks like I'm not alone - DaDragon) feel that what we got out of it at the end of the day was good but not amazing.Channel Hopper said:Getting to Mars was always easier than getting to a moon of Saturn.
damhy said:I'm not denying the fact that they managed to get a probe on to titan is a great success, but I am just disappointed at the imagery coming back, I expected a lot more.
They all looked pretty much identical to me, a few grey pixels. Shame they didnt send a rover up there with a 10mbit digital camera on it, hopefully they will by the time they send one to Europa or Io.Analoguesat said:The raw images are now here (37 pages!)
damhy said:They all looked pretty much identical to me, a few grey pixels. Shame they didnt send a rover up there with a 10mbit digital camera on it, hopefully they will by the time they send one to Europa or Io.
A few plutonium pellets. Once it is in space it will use very little fuel to get it anywhere in the solar system or beyond. Just that initial launch that is the problem well maybe since cassini was powered this way. I'm sure that there is something that they could've done differently. I'm not the scientist behind the projects.Analoguesat said:How much fuel would that need?
Read on the website tonight that the data they thought they had lost was not in fact lost and they now have that raw data, so perhaps there is more to come once it has been processedAnaloguesat said:one of the data relay channels on Cassini failed
damhy said:Maybe the project is a victim of its own success, the fact that it got there in one piece and working perfectly with such a low possibility of success makes it look like something that is relatively easy and therefore makes a few hundred low res black and white images seem like it was all a bit pointless.
Well I suppose that is always going to be the problem with a 7 year trip, if you fitted the latest technology now, something better will be around by the time it arrived. It'ld be why didnt you use a 10 Giga pixel camera, or a holographic snapshot imager (????), some thing new would be around and be better by the time it got there.Channel Hopper said:The launch of Cassinin came unfortunataly at the beginning of big advances in camera technology, digital compression and simultaneous algorithm communication.