Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NoviceSat" data-source="post: 811784" data-attributes="member: 390074">strs65 - if you look at the 1st picture I was using Ka Inverto LNB setting. I only did the second picture using Ku mode as zg3409 asked me to try using Ku settings. As very few devices support Ka it is often less confusing to use Ku values!Channel Hopper - don't you mean so far east? It is disappointing as I was hoping I'd get lucky being in between the two spots. However when I compare my scans with zg3409 I notice that the jamming signal is the same strength as the data humps, but 'real' Saorsat is -4 dBm lower. So I guess even being in the middle and getting both spots the jamming signal is going to win.The final thing I noted whilst scanning on Ka was that light aircraft flying nearby seriously upset the Crazyscans I was doing at the time. An aircraft might cause one spike as it blocks the satellite signal but I have one crazyscan with 5 spikes on it! (RF level spiked from -48dBm to +6dBm)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NoviceSat, post: 811784, member: 390074"] strs65 - if you look at the 1st picture I was using Ka Inverto LNB setting. I only did the second picture using Ku mode as zg3409 asked me to try using Ku settings. As very few devices support Ka it is often less confusing to use Ku values! Channel Hopper - don't you mean so far east? It is disappointing as I was hoping I'd get lucky being in between the two spots. However when I compare my scans with zg3409 I notice that the jamming signal is the same strength as the data humps, but 'real' Saorsat is -4 dBm lower. So I guess even being in the middle and getting both spots the jamming signal is going to win. The final thing I noted whilst scanning on Ka was that light aircraft flying nearby seriously upset the Crazyscans I was doing at the time. An aircraft might cause one spike as it blocks the satellite signal but I have one crazyscan with 5 spikes on it! (RF level spiked from -48dBm to +6dBm) [/QUOTE]

Verification