Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1162807" data-attributes="member: 297935">EUTELSAT Quantum @ 47.7° EneumoDVB can't correctly identify the transponders with weak signals. The spectrum is cluttered with many peaks (much noise?), which affect the useful signal.If on other satellites, neumoDVB with a 6909x card can do wonders compared to Crazyscan; this time, when we have high symbol rates, the application under Windows is cleaner, and with patience, muxes can be locked.Probably on a strong signal such muxes with high symbol rate could have been found correctly, and the spectrum would have looked completely different.The differences between neumoDVB and Crazyscan can be seen more clearly when the signal is weak.&nbsp; This is when most errors (sometimes bugs) and fake feeds occur. Crazyscan seldom gives errors when the signal is weak, either displaying no lock or not at all. As is IQmonitor, using CrazyCat's library, which, if the signal is not strong enough, doesn't display it, and in the best case it displays a clean and even beautiful spectrum, as it did with muxes found and in the 47.7E But about the differences in approach between the two applications have been briefly told by Deeptho and CrazyCat on <a href="https://www.satellites.co.uk/forums/threads/with-neumodvb-and-crazyscan-on-satellites.181570/page-5" target="_blank">#7 and #8</a>Apologies to the two brilliant developers if my judgments about their app are wrong;they are those of a regular user. <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1162807, member: 297935"] [B]EUTELSAT Quantum @ 47.7° E[/B] neumoDVB can't correctly identify the transponders with weak signals. The spectrum is cluttered with many peaks (much noise?), which affect the useful signal. If on other satellites, neumoDVB with a 6909x card can do wonders compared to Crazyscan; this time, when we have high symbol rates, the application under Windows is cleaner, and with patience, muxes can be locked. Probably on a strong signal such muxes with high symbol rate could have been found correctly, and the spectrum would have looked completely different. The differences between neumoDVB and Crazyscan can be seen more clearly when the signal is weak. This is when most errors (sometimes bugs) and fake feeds occur. Crazyscan seldom gives errors when the signal is weak, either displaying no lock or not at all. As is IQmonitor, using CrazyCat's library, which, if the signal is not strong enough, doesn't display it, and in the best case it displays a clean and even beautiful spectrum, as it did with muxes found and in the 47.7E But about the differences in approach between the two applications have been briefly told by Deeptho and CrazyCat on [URL='https://www.satellites.co.uk/forums/threads/with-neumodvb-and-crazyscan-on-satellites.181570/page-5']#7 and #8[/URL] Apologies to the two brilliant developers if my judgments about their app are wrong;they are those of a regular user. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification