Word to the wise from a Wizard, sometimes a few more words help explain the situation to us lesser mortals!Uplink would be on a different frequency.
At TLE epoch (15 June 20:18 UTC) location was 28.2°E.
So indeed 2G will be there or further West (28.05°E or so), if uplink beam must be separated from Astra 2E 28.35°.
Don´t be so daft! It is alive and kicking at 28.2 ish, otherwise I, and 4 ···· other people would not be able to see it, without going outside and moving the dish, again.Not necessarily. They could've looped him in. I think the location of 2G is currently unknown.
The location must be near 28.2 (so not in 28.1 or 28.3), as I was moving my 5m dish towards 28.35, the 10964H signal level decreased. Same also when moving from 28.2 towards 28.0...Not necessarily. They could've looped him in. I think the location of 2G is currently unknown.
2 co-located satellites means 2 sets of uplink frequencies. Co-located satellites are to close together for uplinks to be on the same frequency for both satellites.a few more words help explain the situation to us lesser mortals!
It´s here, only downside is we lose 0.00537dB of signal because of it!Some initial evening results, bad weather, cold, rain (where the h*** is the summer).
Morning,John, your results don't correspond with mine at all. Famaval 1.8m. BBC2 England, 11.7dB. C5 11.4dB.
C5 is up to 12dB now. Is this really a different satellite? Or was it just doing some station keeping maneuver that caused us to see a signal change. Once I've got 24 hours data I'll be able to compare. If I had to guess I'd say all these transponders are on the same satellite as 24 hours ago.¿Is there much change for yourselves dB wise this morning?