Astra 2E: Iberia & Balearics Reports

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pride Of Cucamonga

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
293
Reaction score
114
Points
43
My Satellite Setup
Cheap piece of junk Spanish (Tecatel) 120cm(x110) dish, Inverto Ultra twin LNB and Sky HD box.
My Location
Valencia (city)
2E. How could I align to 2E using a 2F transponder?
Yes. Quite a bit. Look at the attached graph.View attachment 62493
If that happens, realign.

Oops, missed the bit about you aligning to 2E! Cheers for chart - does seem well worth pointing at 28.35. Unfortunately, realigning is a bit of a pain so might wait for Eurobird to disappear to the graveyard orbit as this might open space for 2E and 2F to move to their permanent positions. 28.4 or so for all satellites would seem logical to avoid interference from BADR.
 
Last edited:

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
Eclipse events.

last-24-hours-graph.png
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
However, surely it would be less confusing for the average, non-technical, customer if suppliers/installers used the lesser dimension?
So if you were robbed, and later a policeman was interviewing you, and the policeman asked "how big was he?" would you quote the height or the width of the robber?

Anyway, I for one am not going to damage my business by quoting using a measuring system different from the rest of the market that would make my product seem smaller than everyone else's even though it is identical or maybe bigger.
 

hvdh

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
3,415
Points
113
Age
60
Website
gso-satellites.nl
My Satellite Setup
Dr.HD F16, TBS 5927, T-55, Laminas 120 cm
My Location
Oss, NL (5.5°E 51.8°N)
Didn't know the switch to batteries also comes with reduced power, in this case for Astra 2E.
Do you think reduced power in the earth's shadow is also the rule for other satellites, ore more an exception?
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
Didn't know the switch to batteries also comes with reduced power, in this case for Astra 2E.
Do you think reduced power in the earth's shadow is also the rule for other satellites, ore more an exception?
2D used to do this so much that I couldn't receive it.

This is just the start of the satellite disappearing into the Earth's shadow. Continues until April 12th. Longest time in the shadow happens on 21st March where the satellite is on batteries for 70 minutes. According to the graph 2F doesn't seem affected. But we'll see over the coming days as the duration of the event gets longer.

Solar transit effects, on the other hand, are centred on the 5th of March and affect all geostationary satellites.
 

hvdh

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
3,415
Points
113
Age
60
Website
gso-satellites.nl
My Satellite Setup
Dr.HD F16, TBS 5927, T-55, Laminas 120 cm
My Location
Oss, NL (5.5°E 51.8°N)
If a new satellite like 2E already reduces power in the shadow, looks like the batteries are not dimensioned for full power in the first place (to save space & weight).

About the sun transit on th Clarke belt, yes for you on 38ºN it's centered on 5 March, here on 52ºN it's tomorrow 1 March already!
 

PaulR

Dazed and Confused Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
18,062
Reaction score
4,075
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
-----------See sig-----------
My Location
Wirral, NW UK and Vaucluse, France.
So if you were robbed, and later a policeman was interviewing you, and the policeman asked "how big was he?" would you quote the height or the width of the robber?
That's a ridiculous comparison. You know very well what the working dimensions of a dish are and what its effective size is.

Anyway, I for one am not going to damage my business by quoting using a measuring system different from the rest of the market that would make my product seem smaller than everyone else's even though it is identical or maybe bigger.
That's the real reason.
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
That's a ridiculous comparison.
It was a joke. But shows standard for measurement is based on context.
You know very well what the working dimensions of a dish are and what its effective size is.
Yes true, and just the dish face, not including the rim. But if one of your neighbours complained about your Fibo 90, the planning office would make you take it down because it is taller than 1m, irrespective of what the "working dimensions" might be. And incidentally the "working dimensions" are only of consequence when comparing offset against PF. If you're comparing offset against offset it makes no difference comparing height or width, as long as you do the same in both cases.
 

timo_w2s

Retired moderator
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
4,380
Reaction score
2,898
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo 4K SE
Dr.HD F15
My Location
Maidenhead, UK & Helsinki, Finland
Until I started reading forums with Spanish users it never even occurred to me that someone would measure a dish vertically as the official size, let alone that a UK council would measure it like that for planning purposes.
 

Menorca Man

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
91
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
81
My Satellite Setup
Sky+ HD (2GB Amstrad DRX890) + Generic 1.65m x 1.5m offset with Opticum LQP-04H Quad LNB
My Location
Ciutadella de Menorca
And incidentally the "working dimensions" are only of consequence when comparing offset against PF. If you're comparing offset against offset it makes no difference comparing height or width, as long as you do the same in both cases.
Agreed. You, I and probably everyone else on this forum are aware that there are two different types of dishes. However, I wager the vast majority of satellite TV viewers are not. In their minds eye, 110cm is bigger than 100cm and therefore it has to be better!!

Anyway, enough said and my apologies for drifting off topic. At least we both agree that a common standard, followed by ALL dish suppliers/installers, would be a very good thing. :cool::)
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
let alone that a UK council would measure it like that for planning purposes.
General planning says a sole antenna is exempt from permission if it is "not more than 100 centimetres in any linear dimension".
 

terryashbyash

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
121
Reaction score
27
Points
28
Age
66
My Satellite Setup
skybox F3 for fta/28.2E
inverto black ultra lnb
1m offset
My Location
Gandia, Spain

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
I spotted that this morning during homes under the hammer BBC1, thought the dish I put up on Wednesday was moving in the wind, such a relief when it came back:oops:
Dish must be too small if it went offline, here it is just a bump on the signal graph. but no loss of channels.
 

dxsat

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
745
Reaction score
70
Points
28
Age
70
Website
skyinmadrid.com
My Satellite Setup
Snap's setup: (In Spain) Humax HDR, Prodelin 1.8m dish + Invacom QDF-031 + CM feed, (In UK) CallFlow VDSL + EE 4G, Sky Q, YouView HD, Mac OSX, iOS
My Location
UK: Tonbridge, Kent. Spain: Madrid.
What makes sense is everyone uses the same standard, and in Spain that means measuring the dish vertically, just like a planning officer in the UK would.
It's time for installers in Spain to come clean on the dish measuring issue. This is all about pretending that a dish is bigger than it really is, to make more money. Dish manufacturers measure their products by the horizontal dimension, which is the international standard. It makes a nonsense of any attempt to make a valid comparison between dishes. Installers also often include the non-receiving rim in the measurement.
It's so common for consumers to be ripped off in this way in Spain, and it ought to stop.
 
A

Archive4

Guest
Hi Huevos, I agree with you, you have to set the standard by the country you are in. In Spain, height matters, not girth! As for non recieving rim only a "tonto" would include that in measurement, but I have to agree there are some, hence I started fittting some dishes for my friends and it grew by word of mouth. Also, agree with dxsat, it should stop, but as long as ex-builders, or shop fitters, or lorry drivers, etc,etc,etc, are now sat installlers, then it will continue.

P.S. I was a hairdresser in UK
 
A

Archive4

Guest
Huevos, according to SES both 2E and 2F have the same construction, so why does 2E drop off so much at 22:25ish compared to 2F, do not blame you, blame SES
 

solarboy

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
13
Reaction score
9
Points
3
Age
55
My Satellite Setup
2m PF HauppaugewinNOVAs2/WinMCE
My Location
Algarve,Portugal
Probably dish area would be a better idea?
 
A

Archive4

Guest
Perhaps 2E has not had sufficient solar charge to keep signal equal in "night mode" ie when away from the sun, just a thought.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top